Stephen Brookfield’s “Discussion as a Way of Teaching”
On
page three, Brookfield listed five reasons why discussions fail:
Unrealistic expectations
Unprepared students
No ground rules
Reward systems askew
No teacher modeling
A
former professor from my undergraduate degree—Dr. L.—offered another reason: No
participation from students. I witnessed
this phenomenon last quarter in an English class. The class was small—only 11 students—most of
which were quiet and shy and did not participate in discussions. To counter this problem, Dr. L. had suggested
that teachers make participation worth a grade.
The teacher of my English class did that very thing, making
participation count enough to hurt if they didn’t do it. It
worked. After a reminder about the
participation grade, the students more readily participated in discussions.
I
appreciated Brookfield’s suggestion about making a T-Chart of what respectful
behavior sounds like and looks like (5).
Modeling appropriate behavior leaves less to chance. Depending on the class demographic, perhaps a
T-Chart outlining bad behavior would be valuable as well. That way it’s specified what to expect as
well as behaviors to avoid.
Also
on page five was a reference that made me long for more specific examples in
the entire article. Brookfield stated, “You’re
going to see two 5 minute [sic] excerpts of different discussions” (5). I understand it is simply a script for what
the teacher could say to the students, but I really wanted examples to help me
understand all of Brookfield’s concepts and ideas. I, like many people, appreciate examples to
envision what I’m supposed to do. Similar
to a recipe... if I’m to make a chocolate cake, show me a picture of what the
end product should look like.
No comments:
Post a Comment